You have chosen the best proposal without community consecus.

@valerio.bozzolan please archive Diffusion Repository Creators.

In T15131#5251, @valerio.bozzolan wrote:

As I already stated above, and as stated avivey, I think it could be nice if you share an answer to this question:

Are you sure you're not just trying to pretend Revisions are Tasks?

I don't want to bother you with questions because I like to do so. I'm just asking if you can share more about how you would like to use it, since I'm curious and I don't understand that and you are the only one who can clarify that. For example, maybe I cannot undertand that, since - as I already said - I don't set any Tag to a Diff, but I just set the Tags to the Tasks. This can be useful to maybe understand my point of view and share yours. Feel free to do so in the Task description.

In T15131#5245, @avivey wrote:

This is the kind of features that need a lot of feature-planning before it can be implemented.

• What use-cases would this be designed for?
• Would this be separate from the Tasks workboards or mixed in the same board?
• what would the columns in such a workboard even be?
• are you sure you're not just trying to pretend Revisions are Tasks?

Apart from the analysis paralysis, I think this could be a good candidate for an Extension:

• make the boards code in Core more generic and re-usable
• create an Extension to allow workboards-for-revisions, and quickly iterate on that.

I will add a description

I support Proposal 1 as Proposal 2 seems to be ridiculous for me.

If we implement it in the upstream, we may use it to restrict Countdown to Trusted Contributors if needed.

@valerio.bozzolan use the template

Only users that have signed this agreement may be admitted to Blessed Committers.

This task is no longer valid as account approval is disabled.

Should the confirmation dialog appear from the website or the beowser?

In T15084#3884, @valerio.bozzolan wrote:

I think this could me marked as resolved since lot of users are using Ponder here. Nice.

We can have more fun by adding sounds in more places. To avoid possible mutiny, we should allow users to disable sounds too.

In T15130#3881, @valerio.bozzolan wrote:

I mean, is this related to we.phorge.it?

Your customization is very good.

This should work.

It is important to mention the required version of Git.