Chatlog is marked as deprecated so it should be entirely removed.
Description
Revisions and Commits
rP Phorge | |||
D25480 | rP4d4712b58d2a Remove Chatlog entirely |
Related Objects
- Mentioned In
- 2023 week 49
Next Up
Starmap
Event Timeline
I think this should be done in two parts:
- Remove the UI for Chatlog with a notification in our release notes to save your data.
- After a month, add a migration to drop the database.
If there are no objections, I'll begin work on the first part.
can we keep the actual deletion as optional for a very long time/forever, and at the same time not create the database for new installs?
that will allow installs to backup/export their logs even if they miss the deprecation warning.
FWIW I don't think @avivey implied not doing two parts? I think they were just objecting to part 2 being mandatory after a month, and I for one agree. I've at times not updated Phabricator for > 1 month, and having data deleted unexpectedly after being brought up to date would be unexpected. Not specifically Chatlog in my instance as I've never really used it or Conpherence much, just commenting on data deletion in general. I don't think it's critical to delete data after a 1 month period.
I think it would be totally reasonable for Phorge to just not reference the tables after fully removing it but leave them in the database indefinitely, optionally adding a maintenance script or similar to clean up old data.
I'm not sure what Upstream did in regard to cleaning up old tables if it did, but I know in general it was 'more difficult' to permanently remove data, with appropriate warnings in place.
There's a difference between deleting data as a Phab/Phorge admin (which is done via the bin/delete script, and prints out a massive warning about it potentially breaking stuff and generally being a bad idea), and schema migrations done as part of an upgrade, which would happily delete data without a second thought.
That being said, we could potentially modify the migrations such, that for new installations the table would get created as TEMPORARY, making it disappear on it's own, but not affecting existing installs.
Letting a table with unused data potentially linger indefinitely in the database is IMO better than dropping a table with unused data which someone might still want.