CTO of Lucit https://lucit.cc
- User Since
- Jun 11 2021, 01:37 (18 w, 5 d)
Sat, Oct 16
Yes - I could have some availability - Normally evenings (US Central Time) -
Fri, Oct 15
@speck What can I help with here? - Are we waiting on upstream for anything currently?
Thu, Oct 14
Could you describe in more detail what this change is doing? - Because I am not familiar with celerity, I did read through https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabdev/article/celerity/ for some background.
Wed, Oct 13
@Leon95 - I think this revision will be approved with just including the webkit alternate -
Things seem wildly inconsistent for this particular css string https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge/browse/master/?grep=user-select
I feel like we should move translation to a new revision, so we can move forward with this one.
I tested this revision on Edge just to make sure there were no negative side effects - No issues to report.
Tue, Oct 12
Mon, Oct 11
I am not seeing this behavior. (Using Edge)
Wed, Oct 6
Mon, Oct 4
Thu, Sep 30
Sun, Sep 26
Fri, Sep 24
Thu, Sep 23
Referencing this "short" discussion that I remember from Discourse
Wed, Sep 22
Is it possible to pick a branching off point?
Isn't Centos End of Life soon?
Sep 17 2021
The Herald rule should be project specific. If X happens then move task to Project->Column
Jul 26 2021
Jul 25 2021
Jul 7 2021
I think both solutions work well
Jun 29 2021
Jun 26 2021
There's also the point of users being used to arc land pushing code from their machine, so switching its behavior to delivering different code could have adverse UX.
diff breaks master after rebase
@speck A possible path forward here - We will end up with new revisions, but that is good!
Jun 25 2021
D25012 solves it, but I wonder if we should just exclude it from the "type": "text" linters
We could move this from the global exclude to just the specific linters (like the txt linter, etc.) - That would be a reasonable request
Jun 24 2021
What can I do to Help? -
A few final thoughts here as well
I second everything @speck says here.
Jun 23 2021
I feel we should revert this change from master and back into a revision
I have a lot of concerns about what is happening with these Harbormaster updates. I believe them to be good strategy, and should be welcomed, however..............
Jun 22 2021
T15011 discusses some of this...
Jun 21 2021
Jun 20 2021
One thing to consider are installs where the database is being queried outside of Phabricator - anyone doing data analytics or other tooling that interacts with the database directly would be affected by this change.
Jun 19 2021
My only concern here is that technically this introduces issues for any user install that already contains an untracked package support/aphlict/server/package-lock.json
hmm - I cannot land this revision?
Will need this accepted again by Blessed Committers
Test and Lint coverage?
Jun 18 2021
What happens if
The documentation for installing Aphlict instructs you to npm install ws in the support/aphlict/server/ folder but it looks since that documentation was written newer versions of node/npm will write out package-lock.json which the repository is not setup to ignore. We'll need to add that file to the .gitignore file I think.
A few things @willson556
Jun 17 2021
I have some step by notes in our internal instance for getting SSH going - If you get stuck let me know and I will parse them into a public readable format