Also for Archived Projects, and maybe some other objects.
I'm not sure if there's a generic way to do this, or if each search-engine needs to be updated manually.

Doc(s) on new extensions: I remember having a chapter under /book/contrib/, but I can't find it now. We should build a guide under T15030.
Short answer: create a new repo, make an src dir with all the code, and run arc liberate to create a "library" (including __phutil_library_init__.php and __phutil_library_map__.php), and then add the path of the extension to load-libraries in conf.json.

I'd like to see this as an Extension rather then go into the rP, just because we want to have more stuff as extensions; I think this area is abstracted enough so that it can easily be made that way.

@fgaz - did you find a solution for this?
For the "make Phorge extensions easy to install" feature (which I can't find the ticket for), I have a vague plan of adding another file describing available/installed extensions. I'd like to make packaging harder if I can avoid it, so possibly whatever solves local.json can solve this file too.

Alternatively, maybe catch the existing exception and show a nice error message + the form?

the simplest other-solution would be to extract the exception thrown to its own method, and override that method in the child-class:

How about other functions that might require a logged-in user? "current Viewer's Projects" for example?

unknown magic accepts any kind of input (e.g. letters) and converts it into a 0.

probably "low", but might be interesting to investigate.

Yeah, looks like IntField isn't doing much now (yet?)

@20after4 suggested an "is-application-installed"-aware class-finder recently - I wonder if that would also handle this?

Phacility was very much against this kind of things, but I actually favor supporting some packages, at least for Arcanist on the big package-managers - if nothing else, it would allow us to make sure the package with the right name is doing the right thing.

I keep arcanist cloned in /home/kuba/bin/arcanist. /home/kuba/bin/arc is this executable file:

also, arc get-config hosts --verbose - but note that it will actually print out the tokens, hide those.

That's odd...

• do you have an entry for "https://we.phorge.it/api/" in your ~/.arcrc ?
• I'm also confused about the --trace not including any comment about loading any configuration source - that's probably a bug
• how about echo {} | arc --trace call-conduit -- user.whoami ? in the phorge dir and in other dirs?
• I'm assuming /home/kuba/bin/arc is a symlink to arc that's in ~/Downloads/arc?

The highlighting process could track elapsed time and stop highlighting any further documents after a fixed amount of time elapses...

Since we already show the full (public) key when editing, then I don't see a reason not to show it after it's revoked.

1b. Did you restart FastCGI after updating the code?

1. Yes, you should have D25387 - which makes it very strange that you're getting an exception.
2. That's the trace, yes.
3. I've added you to Trusted Contributors, so you can file bugs in maniphest, etc.

Unless something broke, this task is now complete.

• add PHP version
• rebase

add PHP version information to the view.

I'm just glossing over this - is ArcanistPhpunitTestResultParser now learning to parse generic "junit style xml" format?

If you can hop on IRC/Conpherence in about 4 hours (around 20:00 UTC), I can try debugging this interactively.

maybe use an PhabricatorSearchIntField with a default provided in the buildCustomSearchFields() ?

mmm, ok.

What kind of operation are you doing that involves loading all tasks in a browser?

If this is the only place where we have a "limit"/"page size" field, maybe just remove it?

Is this the only place where we have a "Page size" exposed in the search?

Let the Purge begin!

• rm commented out code

In D25388#13843, @Matthew wrote:

I like renaming the function!

We should probably have a timeline for removing the old function. Do we have a task for that?

The feature was removed for performance and private concerns. I thought Gravatar was alread dead.

I aslo don't see the point of this feature, but that's another issue.

I don't see the point in having this feature. What is it for?

• update some copy

• cleanup

@l2dy are you using an Outlook.com address? we have T15059 which is hard to nail down.

From a product POV, I agree with @valerio.bozzolan - there is (sometimes) some information on commits that would be nice to index in a search engine - comments, mostly.

I don't have much of an attention span these days, sorry.