Good question.

Yeah, that might help (like specifically in the case of the Clone dialog) even though it wouldn't help with dialogs containing writable inputs. (E.g. on the repository page, click Flag For Later instead and press Shift+Tab and Escape.) A better fix would lie at https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge/browse/master/webroot/rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Workflow.js$413 where either the getSpecialKey would need improvement itself to return true for these non-modifying keys, or it would need to be amended with a custom check in that regard. However, I don't know where that function comes from.

Probably something here should be expanded to check if the form contains at least a visible input without read-only

:p

I was responding to the previous comment which...

Our company uses the Phorge, and we use Keycloak as IAM. Keycloak is a very popular OAuth2/SAML provider now.

GitHub/Facebook is already supported as an Login/Registration providers.

In T15047#1308, @speck wrote:

Did that Phactory: Hosting Projects Here

I can reproduce this, on an hosted Subversion repository.

Yes will be great to see a SAML or Oauth support for external authorities like:

• Keycloak
• Entra ID
• Github
• Facebook
• WeChat / WeCom

Premising that we may want to rollback 328aee033fbd, probably this line is broken:

Ouch. Probably partially my fault. Feel free to escalate this as Task under Bug Reports - close this as obsolete then

I can reproduce this on master with basically any string search.

https://we.phorge.it just works fine. :L

Interesting. This cannot be reproduced here in this website https://we.phorge.it? isn't it? I think no

:p

(Please edit file Visibility to make them Public :D It's another bug ihih - thanks! <3)

The exception throw out when I search text in search bar:

Please also include your exact search. I think you are searching by https://foo and that is unfortunately not possible without "doing this"

@avivey to do now:

Your email address(es) set by you for your user account in the Phorge Project

That is private data. Nobody can access it.

I have a problem with this statement:

Would you like to go to court to defend that statement? :)

OK OK. So what else? Maybe this (mention from https://secure.phabricator.com/p/epriestley/):

I could not sign it if it required brushing three times a day. Removed purely due to egoistic laziness reasons.

No brushing teeth three times a day? However it looks good to me 👍

Well, I would rewrite quite a bit, so I'll post a draft here before editing directly:

Totally agree. Thanks for any edit in the stub.