For the record we are up to 22 user in the channel currently.

So, I sent a community registration ticket back in July,and never heard back. They say they have a backlog. I think though it would be easier if we do a project registration and have it be done by somebody who can verify that they represent Phorge. (either through a file on the web root or else DNS)

@io for GitHub we have a task (T15046)

For the rest, I think they can be created on an as-needed basis.

I will note that also the tech docs aren’t fully generated since there should be docs for most of the phorge/phabricator classes. Also the arcanist docs aren’t generated at all.

Now that I look at this some more, this isn’t quite done - there are still some components of phorge that are missing projects.

Looks good, hopefully this can be landed some time soon.

I’ll note here that I’m going to work on creating projects for some of the prototypes that do get used.

Also when I look at a diff on upstream phabricator i see a land revision button - but I don’t see that for diffs on this instance.

@speck for rARC Trusted Contributors can land but rP is restricted to Blessed Committers

the only global config option I can find is the timezone, so either way changes to phorge core would be required. Timezone has no default value. (It's typically controlled by the php date.timezone setting)

For irc there is Phorge on Libera.chat. I’ve submitted a ticket for community registration after speaking with staff, but I haven’t heard back. (Ticket was submitted 3 weeks ago). Matrix - not sure

Per https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge/manage/policies/ the push policy for this repo is set to Blessed Committers

Could a member of Blessed Committers please land this? I can't do it my self (no write access) and I would appreciate it.

I would also love to contribute to Phorge. I have signed the legalpad doc.

And for google you don't need to provide an email, you can also just get a gmail address.

@speck we can use the existing GitHub organization for oauth. (an owner can setup the app in settings)

Just as a note, All of the mentioned chat platforms can be bridged together.

We don't seem to have any opposition to having a community/support IRC channel, so perhaps I'll start working with Libera staff on registration.

In T15035#1019, @TitanNano wrote:

Are there any thoughts about a matrix channel? It would also be possible to bridge it to IRC.

In T15001#980, @MacFan4000 wrote:

Just a note that Trusted Contributors can’t self grow beyond admins adding people currently as to add members you need to be able to edit the project. Currently only admins can edit the project.

In T15035#1008, @eax wrote:

FWIW I don't object to support or community channels off-instance but I do think we need:

• all decisions should be made on-instance
• we should have a culture of ensuring that any "interesting" discussions get recorded on-instance.

I would certainly be happy to work with Libera staff to get the community registered.

Thanks for accepting this. I can’t land it though, somebody with the proper permissions will need to do it.

In T15030#978, @20after4 wrote:

regarding a monorepo, I'm not sure if there is an advantage to that, I'm fine with individual repos. I currently maintain most of Wikimedia's extensions in a single monorepo but I'd consider splitting them out into individual repos if any one them were candidates for upstreaming.

Just a note that Trusted Contributors can’t self grow beyond admins adding people currently as to add members you need to be able to edit the project. Currently only admins can edit the project.

In T15000#888, @MacFan4000 wrote:

And also we perhaps should have an IRC channel such as #phorge on Libera. It would be possible to bridge it to Zulip.

Abandoned as this will not be needed with the upstream patch merged.

For this phorge instance, I think we should configure auth providers to allow logging in with Github/Google etc.