I’ll note here that I’m going to work on creating projects for some of the prototypes that do get used.

In T15002#1203, @MacFan4000 wrote:

I’ll note here that I’m going to work on creating projects for some of the prototypes that do get used.

I just wanted to note that Phrequent is an integral part in my company, even though it's a prototype. We heavily rely on time tracking.

In T15002#1224, @TitanNano wrote:

I just wanted to note that Phrequent is an integral part in my company, even though it's a prototype. We heavily rely on time tracking.

I honestly think that there's a lot of very good alternatives for time tracking out there that provide a ton of features and creature comforts that Phrequent doesn't. I personally would think that time tracking is outside the scope of a project like Phorge. I'd argue that time tracking should be done by third party software or an extension (which Phrequent could become).

My argument for it being outside the scope: The time spent handling a task provides no measure of the quality of the resolution provided. There's no correlation between quality code and the time taken to write it. It's generally just used for accounting purposes and HR-planning.