In T15080#1970, @speck wrote:

Unfortunately this type of issue is in an area that's beyond my network/configuration experience. Is CloudFlare our NS provider?

• e95157e39bf5 Show matching context from the document body in ferret search results
  • This is not perfect but it generally works - display a snippet from the matched document and highlight the matched words - kind standard and expected from any full-text search engine. Probably not my best work as far as code quality / it's a bit hacky and performance may not be stellar, however, it's been in use at wikimedia for quite some time without any major issues that I'm aware of.
• bba62cf52435 Hide the "hidden" fields on custom form previews.
  • This is a single line change to css that makes things a lot cleaner when you have a lot of custom forms with a lot of custom fields.
  • submitted as D25037
• 9191d4838278 Make "task type" and date-type custom fields work in herald.
• 3d33d1cceac7 Implement Atom/RSS discovery on Phame blog pages
• ebfe30890b52 Add column sequence to the conduit api results for column.search
  • This seems like an obvious omission from the conduit api for columns and the change is straightforward.
  • submitted as D25038
• 893664bd44b8 EditEngine: 'Duplicate Form' action to create new forms from existing config.
  • This makes it much easier to clutter up your custom forms with 100 variations of your forms. It also makes it much easier to make a new form vs. starting from scratch every time. It's sort of a hack and the custom form management UI needs a lot of improvement generally, this was just the minimum change I could implement to make life slightly easier for myself and fellow Wikimedia phab admins. Not sure it's a good idea in the upstream without further changes to go with it.
• 44a94dc04b3f Fix validation of "column" transaction type in "maniphest.edit"

In T15080#1970, @speck wrote:

Unfortunately this type of issue is in an area that's beyond my network/configuration experience. Is CloudFlare our NS provider?

Unfortunately this type of issue is in an area that's beyond my network/configuration experience. Is CloudFlare our NS provider?

Ok, so in zulip in #general under the bridge topic that is bridged to IRC.

Hello, does anyone have an update about when the Phorge code might be hosted on GitHub? Thank you

I think this task is mostly resolved. The zulip chat is a temporary thing, and it hasn't been used anytime recently. We could bridge the IRC channel to it if we wanted to have a more permanent zulip instance.

Thanks for the ping, @MacFan4000. I am in and out because this is my last full-time semester, but I do see the room and have been checking in on it.

@speck I can’t get you added as you aren’t currently authenticated with NickServ.

Thanks for setting this up. I would like to be a group contact for the room.

In T15035#1445, @MacFan4000 wrote:

So, I sent a community registration ticket back in July,and never heard back. They say they have a backlog. I think though it would be easier if we do a project registration and have it be done by somebody who can verify that they represent Phorge. (either through a file on the web root or else DNS)

For the record we are up to 22 user in the channel currently.

So, I sent a community registration ticket back in July,and never heard back. They say they have a backlog. I think though it would be easier if we do a project registration and have it be done by somebody who can verify that they represent Phorge. (either through a file on the web root or else DNS)

For the rest, I think they can be created on an as-needed basis.

This describes how to set up an IRC nick for matrix users: https://gist.github.com/LorbusChris/d44a5dd4671796cbf8528ca133dd909b

This is something we probably want to wait for the rebrand to occur as it could be considered "releasing". Granted these repos are already public so it wouldn't be too different than what we have now.

In T15002#1224, @TitanNano wrote:

I just wanted to note that Phrequent is an integral part in my company, even though it's a prototype. We heavily rely on time tracking.

In T15002#1203, @MacFan4000 wrote:

I’ll note here that I’m going to work on creating projects for some of the prototypes that do get used.

I didn't manage to get #phorge:libera.chat to work, but here's what I did:

In T15035#1188, @speck wrote:

@TitanNano with the matrix bridge up could you provide instructions on how to connect to that? I setup the Element client on my machine but I'm not sure how to get on that phorge channel.

@TitanNano with the matrix bridge up could you provide instructions on how to connect to that? I setup the Element client on my machine but I'm not sure how to get on that phorge channel.

Hey everyone, I just learned about the Phabricator situation and I'd love to contribute to the project in any capacity I can. I've been around the discourse for some time and love Phabricator to bits and would love to keep it and see it thrive again!

In T15035#1086, @MacFan4000 wrote:

Matrix - not sure

For irc there is Phorge on Libera.chat. I’ve submitted a ticket for community registration after speaking with staff, but I haven’t heard back. (Ticket was submitted 3 weeks ago). Matrix - not sure

Is there information about the IRC channel or Matrix channel on how to get set up? If there's chat I'll try to join in but I won't be able to be always-connected.

To be fair, I'm almost certainly not going to install yet another client just for this community chat. (I know I'm not alone in this, projecting forward into the project's future.) Matrix + IRC with bridges to the other protocols seems the way to go. (I'm usually on IRC...albeit, not much this month because my plate's full.)

Just as a note, All of the mentioned chat platforms can be bridged together.

I'm not a big fan of IRC because in order to look through history or pickup where a user last joined it requires individual users to maintain their own tooling/practices. The temp-community chat was the first Zulip chat that I've used, and installed the mobile app for. I thought Zulip worked pretty well and wouldn't mind continuing with that. I've used Matrix (Element?) briefly but didn't feel too strongly about it. It's probably worth mentioning that our current Zulip instance has ~135 members and we've still had ~1-2 new people join per week lately. Though there's not much actual discussion going on there.

We don't seem to have any opposition to having a community/support IRC channel, so perhaps I'll start working with Libera staff on registration.

I just want everything "important" to be happening here, where the search and cross-references works and async communication is easy.

I prefer IRC but don't have any issues with having Matrix bridged there, but I would prefer to not have separate unbridged channels to reduce fragmentation of the already-small community.

In T15035#1019, @TitanNano wrote:

Are there any thoughts about a matrix channel? It would also be possible to bridge it to IRC.

In T15035#1019, @TitanNano wrote:

Are there any thoughts about a matrix channel? It would also be possible to bridge it to IRC.

Are there any thoughts about a matrix channel? It would also be possible to bridge it to IRC.

In T15035#1008, @eax wrote:

FWIW I don't object to support or community channels off-instance but I do think we need:

• all decisions should be made on-instance
• we should have a culture of ensuring that any "interesting" discussions get recorded on-instance.

FWIW I don't object to support or community channels off-instance but I do think we need:

• all decisions should be made on-instance
• we should have a culture of ensuring that any "interesting" discussions get recorded on-instance.

I would certainly be happy to work with Libera staff to get the community registered.

Dashboard adjusted, we only need to work on the links. Dashboard has been set to the home page.

Dashboard is a start on a dashboard

Just my 2cts:

Welcome to Phorge. Phorge is an open source, community driven platform for collaborating, managing, organizing and reviewing software development projects. You can learn more about the features of Phorge [here] and how to install Phorge [here]. You can ask for help [here] and [here] and you can learn about contributing to Phorge (here)

On the topic of increasing community involvement we will also want to produce documentation for setting up development environments as well as the steps to submit changes upstream (like a quality checklist). To make development environments even easier we might want to consider supporting something like a vagrantfile so people can get started with very few steps.

I feel that the first center-panel should be a "Welcome" panel. This panel would in the shortest amount of text possible :

There is great benefit from having people submitting the code to push it themselves.

So some feedback from my experience doing this in the open.

As of right now, both Blessed Committers and Security Viewers have the admins as members. I have no problem with that changing.

In T15001#38, @chris wrote:

Could just do like Phorge Upstream → Governance, Phorge → Maniphest, etc. with subprojects to have a kind of clean-ish separation between "application" stuff and "administrative" stuff?

Could just do like Phorge Upstream → Governance, Phorge → Maniphest, etc. with subprojects to have a kind of clean-ish separation between "application" stuff and "administrative" stuff?

I was initially planning to use Phorge for upstream maintenance and project governance and using individual projects for apps (Maniphest, for example). If Phorge is about the software, where are you planning to put project governance?

One final change I will make, I've created a phorge.it install project, so that way the Phorge project can be about the software.