Not sure what "similar working links" means... Something like https://we.phorge.it/diviner/find/?name=PhutilSafeHTML ?

Is this also the reason why links to e.g. https://we.phorge.it/diviner/find/?name=JX.behavior&type=function&jump=1 on https://we.phorge.it/book/javelin/article/behaviors/ or to http://we.phorge.it/diviner/find/?name=JX.Stratcom&type=class&jump=1 are 404s, or do I misunderstand and that's a separate issue?

Urgh. In calling https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge/browse/master/src/applications/diviner/query/DivinerAtomQuery.php$340 , $this->titles is an array which has a length of 1, with its only member being null. Sounds like there's already something fishy before.

Where I can find similar working links? I've tried generating Diviner books for both Arcanist and Phorge but http://phorge.localhost/diviner/find/?name=JX.Stratcom is still giving me 404

Thanks for finding a way to reproduce! I still fail to find the right timing here to produce a testcase, so this is another untested shot in the dark.

No, as project membership is unrelated to task object policy, as a task can associated to more than one project.

Just for the glory of the archive. I've tested this feature in production before landing.

I guess this is the time. Feel free to land as usual with

Well, I doubt we can dig more than this.

I think that is complex because some admins are not well active on their platforms, so as said before it can be underdimensioned

@aklapper I see. What do you think about D25301#15795 ?

• updated screenshot access to All Users
• thanks, that task would solve the problem!
• alternatively, "Project Members" option could be made available as an object policy for tasks

@valerio.bozzolan also, triggers don't offer an option to change task space or task access.

OK. Full immersion mode 🌈

I'm trying to reproduce, creating a repository, stopping phlog, and pushing, and starting and immediately randomly stopping phlog.

At the moment we have a multi-thread command existence checker, and it early dies if a command is not existing.

I wonder if "Workboard Triggers" may do the job here.

I've filed T15908 for the "quick create from column to do what I mean".

(@arp - the images you pasted did not get Attached, so they are Private; Please set them manually to Public so they can be seen. We have an open ticket for that somewhere)

be based on unit tests

It's 3 days past the scheduled execution date but the settings in dashboard and docs are still there.

I see. So, is that functionality already a part of arc diff? In other words, if arc work T123 would have worked exactly the same way as arc work branch-name (by creating a branch that's called either T123 or branch-name), then arc diff would correctly link it?

Yes - it works seamlessly because if the local branch has a task number in it, the diff is automatically linked to that task when you run arc diff

OK thanks

It's probably better to exclude ICS files from TXT in .arclint, or define their own section, rather then add hard-coded exceptions in here.

remove unuseful newline

Oh wow, that is a really unexpected way to create tags.

We have a public project tag used by a team. Some tasks associated with that public project tag are public tasks visible to everyone and anyone, so they are not in an access-restricted Space but default S1. Some tasks associated with that public project tag are temporarily non-public, "secret" tasks that should only be visible to that team and nobody else, so they are in an access-restricted Space that can only be accessed by team members.

In my installation this would not be a reasonable expectation. We have a public project tag used by a team. Some tasks associated with that public project tag are public tasks visible to everyone and anyone, so they are not in an access-restricted Space but default S1. Some tasks associated with that public project tag are temporarily non-public, "secret" tasks that should only be visible to that team and nobody else, so they are in an access-restricted Space that can only be accessed by team members.
So I'd rather envision a Herald rule: for a Maniphest task, if is newly created is true && Space is Sxx, then add project tag #whatever. (The other way round is not particularly feasible: The task would have a default view setting for a moment and potentially visible to outsiders, before moving it to a view-restricted Space).

I was confused about why I couldn't tag a task with any random tag that I wanted to create on the fly as I'd do in Meta's Phabricator. It took me some time to realize that tags mean projects.

To clarify: currently existing auto-tagging is not about the column from which the task is created. It's about tagging with the project to which the column belongs.

It's not "impossible" on the technical level, it's just not obviously the right solution.

But also, why is it impossible? When a task is created from a column, it automatically pre-populates the tag column with the project it is created from. It seems trivial to implement a patch that would auto-detect the project's space and set it accordingly for the task.

Then, if every project could choose its own Task Create/Edit Form Configuration, it would solve the issue. Maybe form configurations could be tagged with projects, and when no tag = show for all projects?

I'd assume that it also links the task and the diff together and optionally allows to close the task automatically on diff land?