In T15100#18699, @aklapper wrote:I'm not skilled enough to look into the bigger picture, however maybe the Edit Column dialog could have a third field apart from Name and Point Limit to also have Task Limit (or Card Limit?). Point Limit and Task Limit then must be mutually exclusive (do not allow to set both for a column, or even...board?), somehow.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Dec 29 2024
Dec 29 2024
Iniquity added a comment to T15100: [Feature request] Option to measure WIP limits based on card count instead of points, to more closely adhere to Kanban standards..
Oct 16 2024
Oct 16 2024
@Iniquity - Problem solved by removing that sentence lol - thanks. Now seems super-freshy
Thanks! :)
Sep 6 2024
Sep 6 2024
dtf awarded Update From Phabricator a Mountain of Wealth token.
Aug 31 2024
Aug 31 2024
Iniquity added a comment to T15801: Mention on landing page that Phorge is a community fork of Phabricator.
It seems to me that in general more information should be added to the main page: screenshots, main features, as is usually done in other large projects.
Apr 28 2024
Apr 28 2024
I agree that an additional status is needed for closing when creating a task. Current statuses are not obvious. "Closed, Graduated" is good to fast decision.
Iniquity added a comment to T15801: Mention on landing page that Phorge is a community fork of Phabricator.
Suddenly, yesterday I was also talking in one of the kanban communities and I had to tell them that Phorge is a fork of the Phabricator, and not some kind of independent thing without a background. People don't quite understand this.
Apr 26 2024
Apr 26 2024
I was just surprised that they weren't here, considering that they are used very successfully on Wikimedia. Do you think they are not needed here?
Apr 25 2024
Apr 25 2024
@avivey hi!
I cant reproduce it. Is the problem still there?
Iniquity updated the answer details for Q130: How to join the group "Trusted Contributors"? (Answer 160).
This guide is up-to-date up to 2022 Week 37.
@valerio.bozzolan hi! :) It seems to me that this proposal may scare someone away, since it feels like this guide is two years out of date :) Is that true?
Iniquity added a comment to T15082: Consider allowing milestone columns to be ordered arbitrarily on workboards.
It seems to me that this problem can be solved with an additional setting that turns this functionality on or off.
Iniquity moved T15798: Add a link to a pre-filled Ponder queue with a project tag in the project menu from Backlog to Feature Requests on the Ponder board.
Iniquity updated the task description for T15798: Add a link to a pre-filled Ponder queue with a project tag in the project menu.
Iniquity moved T15171: Ponder: add "Hide" button on your answer from Backlog to Feature Requests on the Ponder board.
Iniquity moved T15711: Ponder: "New Answer" input box should be hidden for those without permissions. from Backlog to Bug Reports on the Ponder board.
Iniquity moved T15731: Editing Ponder Comments is broken from Backlog to Bug Reports on the Ponder board.
Iniquity moved T15797: Ponder: edits to answers are not reflected consistently in comments to it from Backlog to Bug Reports on the Ponder board.
Iniquity moved T15450: Configure another Ponder Question status "Closed, Graduated" from Backlog to Feature Requests on the Ponder board.
Iniquity added a project to T15450: Configure another Ponder Question status "Closed, Graduated": Ponder.
Thanks!!
Apr 24 2024
Apr 24 2024
In T15056#3210, @golyalpha wrote:
Thanks for the answer! Can you recreate it please!? :)
Thanks! :)
Apr 23 2024
Apr 23 2024
And I clearly missed being able to answer my colleague's question (Q128) that week.
I am an active member of the MediaWiki technical community (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Iniquity/), and when I learned about the Phorge I wanted to do create some tasks. Plus I wanted to edit this task T15056 at least :)
Apr 21 2024
Apr 21 2024
Iniquity awarded Q128: How deeply is Ponder integrated with the rest of Phorge? a Love token.
Feb 23 2024
Feb 23 2024
In D25491#15484, @20after4 wrote:In D25491#15482, @Iniquity wrote:Hello! Are you sure changing the links color is a good idea? Perhaps we should just make the background darker?
I actually think a darker background and lighter link color would be good. Maybe not quite as light as #accadf, perhaps #46B2FF or so
Feb 17 2024
Feb 17 2024
Hello! Are you sure changing the links color is a good idea? Perhaps we should just make the background darker?
Iniquity awarded T15056: Improve Dark Mode a Love token.
Content licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC-BY-SA) unless otherwise noted; code licensed under Apache 2.0 or other open source licenses. · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Apache 2.0