To avoid that $xactions[0] we should probably find the desired transaction.

Thanks my friend, this works perfectly

we can remove an undeclared variable, and add a nonempty-str check

dedicating Conpherence its own diff as mturdus requested

I think GitHub allows that syntax only in comments 🤔

OK try this to restore your desired situation (so, two diffs)

OK, I think we have something mathematical and bombproof

add even more useful links

I must read this:

Papa Beaver's Storytime done. Thanks

Well, to be honest, feel free to generalize the description and commit message to include both changes, since they are the very same thing

(Do you need a little help to split the changes in two diffs?)

Thanks again. I've found this interesting, so, added in the code itself:

improvement thanks to dear @l2dy

Thanks again @20after4 for the efforts.

This documentation is nice but unfortunately the feature introduced in 4d12d014fd9d never worked :( So documenting this as-is may create confusion, at the moment. Next steps:

Wow 😍 looks promising (untested from my side)

About the cursor: pointer;, yep it would be super-nice, but no need to create distinctions between mobile and desktop for that probably 🤔 let's always show it.

Premising that as web developer I'm really super surprised to have never seen in my life a native <summary> + <detail>, even in demos 🤔 I've never seen it in basic online courses for beginners ( https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_js_collapsible.asp ) - and that's surprising since there it would be nice; not in online forums with super-basic "spoiler" features (e.g. https://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/forums/forum-discussion-info/514283-how-do-i-make-spoilers-on-the-forum ) and there it would be nice, not in Bootstrap and not in MaterializeCSS (and it would be nice to have examples there to save some JavaScript); not in MediaWiki (because there, "esoteric" tags are disabled; so, since the beginning, every single wiki in the planet has 10 lines of JavaScript in their Common.js), etc.

(About my "like Wikipedia" I mean https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Hidden )

To have this a bit more flexible we should probably toggle visibility by JavaScript. (So, we can keep divs, and this makes the change also a bit more backward compatible probably)

I do not understand if we have some race conditions, or, if the __destruct() is not properly called because of a bug in PHP 8.3.8, which is possible but unlikely

Visually marking this as "ongoing discussion for code changes" to keep historically nice error messages

I love this collapsible on mobile since it saves a lot of scrolls, but I think the collapsible on desktop can just add confusion without clear benefits (since the desktop layout is not vertical, and saving vertical space does not help in showing more information). Probably this should only apply on .device-tablet and .device-phone, but not .device-desktop

It makes sense since these are Phorge stuff, not Arcanist stuff. Thanks.

Agree with your considerations and tested 🌈

Maybe in the future. At the moment it's just an extra unnecessary configuration.

I see you marked this question as Resolved. Was it?

somewhere before the this

click

I love this at unbelievable level, thanks all 🌈

After 15 minutes of reading stuff around on the web, I think we need a little help. Waiting for answers (and waiting for downvotes lol).

This might (or should be) covered by the unit tests

Feel free to kill this method violently 🗡 since as you said this is protected (no external usages) + final (no overrides) and visibly broken since 5 years

Partially related, it's damn easy to type a dagger "🗡" since it appears by typing :D ... lol

In D25691#19103, @aklapper wrote:

Any chance to share the related stacktrace?

In D25694#19020, @avivey wrote:

What if $cdn has some evil characters? Do we have some escaping