PhorgePublicGeneral discussions about Phorge. For long and complex questions, you may want to use Ponder.
BTW maybe Microsoft is discarding our emails also because of this T15036: Phorge upstream mail should not use @upstream.phorge.dev addresses
Because of T15036 I think ihih
I don't get why [[ /\evil.com ]] should become a link. It's in our unit tests as desired situation
https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge/browse/master/src/infrastructure/markup/remarkup/__tests__/remarkup/link-noreferrer.txt
I mean, it becomes an absolute link to https://evil.com/
OK no, sorry, I'm stupid. It's Firefox that expands that
https://we.phorge.it/w/changelog/next_up/#form-submission-in-new-tab
isn't this supposed to be ctrl+enter?
Thanks, fixed, sorry 💃🏼
Proudly by mouse hackers
i'm both a mouse and a keyboard hacker xD
I suspect that's the reason why the test plan was not working for me LOL
xD how-
If someone feels like running grep, https://we.phorge.it/differential/?ids=25752,25749,25742#R is some long hanging cleanup fruit welcoming reviews
i just realized that the video in https://we.phorge.it/w/changelog/next_up/#form-submission-in-new-tab shows it not working
here's a new one:
and also, slight grammar fix:
The forms can be submitted in a new tab with Ctrl-enter. Proudly by keyboard hackers.
Forms can now be submitted in a new tab with CTRL+enter. Proudly by keyboard hackers.
oh, you can't quite easily get the file from that
here: F2670828
Why was not working? not visible?
it showed ctrl+enter opening the search results in the current tab, not a new one
also, what chat is more suitable for heavy traffic/slight banter? Z1: Phorge or Z5: Phorge (flame)
Indeed you can flame in Z5, enjoy its description :)
does anyone know how to properly tackle T15972: Add config option for maximum file size? (as in, know where to modify specifically that fully works)
So we are trying to remove some very large files (say up to 11gb) that are eating up all the disk space for our install, and in at least one case we hit the error described in T15125 but either way it seems that the files aren’t being deleted on disk, and phorge’s file structure makes it hard to delete them manually. So we are trying to find some way to fully delete.
arc diff, to commit all files,
or arc diff file1 file2 to commit these files
I mean, for your case, you already proposed a commit and you probably would like to, download it again:
arc patch D25857
Then land it:
arc land
I suppose you are working on the master directly. Ideally, don't work in master.
Keep the master in sync with upstream. Do changes in other local git branches.
That's simple. If you want to totally reset your master, do this:
git fetch git reset --hard origin/master
If you want to download again your changes, do this as I said:
arc patch D25857 arc diff arc diff arc diff arc land
(Note, arc land without any argument)
If you want to work on something else, do this instead:
git branch featurelol1 git checkout featurelol1 arc diff arc diff arc diff arc diff arc diff arc land # when approved
If you want to work on something else, repeat above.
If you want to focus on something else:
git checkout featurelol2 arc diff arc diff arc diff git checkout featurelol1 arc diff arc diff arc diff
So with git branch a you create a branch, with git checkout you switch branch.
Useful git features that allows you to don't touch master and avoid extra complications when proposing changes
To Subversion users: enjoy D25823 \o/
@valerio.bozzolan For arc diff, should I use origin or master?
👍
Re: cloning from here vs GitHub, GH should be much faster because they have multiple sites and clouds and stuff.
The GH repos are mirrors of the ones here; Any commit made should be available in GH a few seconds later (but we had some problems with that before).
You can't land (push) to GH, but I think arc land will know to handle that anyway.
ho, on this install specifically - yeah, maybe. I've set it to Trusted Contributors for now.
Maybe we need an example Subversion repository here, with just a README, to test D25823 in this production. Otherwise I think nobody will test
Yah! so we can apt install svn for extra easy lazy fun (not really critical for nothing) - T15983
Anybody at next FOSDEM for a small meetup with laptops?
https://fosdem.org/2025/
Are there too many jokes in the new Diviner documentation of the new project destruction workflow D25772 ?
Feel free to say so. But also please indicate what should be removed lol
@Arkus404: please stop tests, or your account may be disabled
Yep, create a branch starting from your patch, and arc diff that, with this trick: arc diff HEAD as extra care I think
So the arc diff HEAD only sends the last commit, and not the full difference with master
Interesting. In GitLab.com the "this task depends on that" is usually "not available for the current subscription tier".
Click here on Clone then Manager Password https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge/
The git has a dedicated "VCS" password
@valerio.bozzolan Thanks for the help!
Could a Blessed Committers review D25877?
I can't land as the push policy for rHP is Blessed Committers. Could it be lowered to Trusted Contributors?
I'd appreciate if someone could accept https://we.phorge.it/D25885 . Looks like I again screwed up somehow when rebasing (Would love to see "bin/celerity map" run somehow automagically)
Are you still able to run ./bin/diviner generate in latest master arcanist/phorge locally?
Using --trace I see that it remains stuck after the Phorge Contributor Documentation. Then I get a Lock wait timeout exceeded
OK nothing, I've just a monster query running since hours in my laptop on diviner_liveatom and stucking everything (even if it does not seem a good news lol)
I'd welcome your opinionated, heated arguments on https://we.phorge.it/T15998 (adding an "Authored Tasks" item to the user profile menu panel) in the spectrum between "omg yesh lol" and "hell no!!!1". TIA!