User Details
- User Since
- Feb 28 2023, 20:44 (103 w, 1 d)
- Availability
- Available
Yesterday
Alright, even after calling ->withEpochInRange(null, null) this very code change (comparing null with null) works fine without a problem, so I'd not add that additional null check
Oh wait I totally misunderstood you, sigh
Uh, nice thought! Phorge accepts and handles correctly one or two parameters being null which I think is fine as-is, so I'd only check for switched parameters created by confused developers here.
Tue, Feb 18
Ooops, indeed. Thanks for finding that. Abandoning in favor of D25869.
For consistency, I'm wondering whether to
- rename src/applications/people/menuitem/PhabricatorPeopleTasksProfileMenuItem.php to src/applications/people/menuitem/PhabricatorPeopleTasksAssignedProfileMenuItem.php,
- rename src/applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleProfileTasksController.php to src/applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleProfileTasksAssignedController.php,
- update const ITEM_TASKS = 'people.tasks' to const ITEM_TASKS_ASSIGNED = 'people.tasks.assigned;,
- update 'tasks/(?P<id>[1-9]\d*)/' =>'PhabricatorPeopleProfileTasksController' to 'tasks-assigned/(?P<id>[1-9]\d*)/' =>'PhabricatorPeopleProfileTasksAssignedController'
as there is more than one "task" thingie now?
Mon, Feb 17
Eh, let's make this exit(0) as that's more consistent with existing calls in the Arcanist codebase
Thanks. I can confirm with PHP 8.4.4 after upgrading one of my machines.
Probably same game as T15679 somewhere in src/applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionMoveController.php
grep -r " id(" --include=*.php . | wc -l gives a whopping 11220 results.
Would we accept a patch if I cooked up one? :)
I fail to reproduce with PHP 8.3 with the given steps: ../arcanist/bin/arc diff --create --help prints the help as expected, with no error.
Which PHP version do you use?
git rebase master
Okay, got to wait until D25885 is merged first
Okay, got to wait until D25885 is merged first
Sun, Feb 16
Let's try again without celerity noise
I wonder what's wrong with my CSS/JS, sigh
As I uploaded a new diff now how do I request a new review / reset the existing one "Changes Requested"?
"Foist Upon", or which vaguely named oh so "funny" option from the "Add Action..." dropdown which makes non-native speakers feel stupid and be scared to choose the wrong option? Oh UX and usability...
having a portal with something useful (e.g. a Dashboard): shows the Dashboard
Run ./bin/celerity map
Rename function to override from parent class, as proposed by Valerio
Right, PhabricatorDashboardPortalProfileMenuEngine extends PhabricatorProfileMenuEngine so we can override newNoContentView()... that probably makes most sense, thanks
I'd love to see better steps to reproduce something somewhere. :-/ I cannot even find e.p.p. or epp. somewhere in the Finnish translations anymore...
I expanded the test plan a bit, still if there is more to add please also expand. This seems to work for me (phamous last words)
Fix unaligned elements by changing margin-left: -200px to -200px for div.phui-document-content and for full-size images
git rebase master
./bin/celerity map as this touches a JS file
@mturdus: Could you land this one please, or would you like any help? Thanks!
@valerio.bozzolan: Would you like to give this a (hopefully) final review? TIA!
Setting Request Changes per the small review comments so far (as I am looking at https://we.phorge.it/differential/query/all/ and it helps to see correct statuses)
Thanks for the patch! I can confirm that after applying the patch, on PHP 8.3 I can successful create the initiative http://phorge.localhost/I4 (and I get an unrelated PHP 8.1 deprecation warning about strlen(): Passing null to parameter #1 in src/applications/fund/xaction/FundInitiativeDescriptionTransaction.php:19)
This is impressive, thanks for writing this up! I don't have enough expertise to comment on the "Edit Phases", however all in all this looks super helpful for technical understanding!
Confirming that this works as expected. I took the liberty to expand the commit message to also include the current error message.
Sat, Feb 15
With D25878 applied, dialog for folks who can use Herald:
Fri, Feb 14
null as fast as possible
Errm yes, now for real
Short-circuit null check, as rightfully proposed by Valerio
No, because people do not read. The "read-only mirror" Wikimedia and GNOME code repos on GitHub regularly receive pull requests because people do not read anything.