This is @Cigaryno's workboard. Tasks created by/assigned to this user goes here.
Details
Fri, Apr 25
Ok, I'll improve it, because I still have a lot to learn about Phorge and its source code, otherwise I'll fix those issues myself
If there is an issue in Phorge then please provide steps to reproduce in Phorge. Please also strip unneeded full quotes which make comments hard to read. Thanks!
I just checked that the issue can be replicated in the Accessibility workboard, on the Affects-Wikimedia workboard it looks good
Tue, Apr 22
Fix was reverted for now as it had bad side effects.
Mon, Apr 21
T391929 In that task on Wikimedia Phabricator, I had put some issues
Mar 31 2025
Looks good to me, thanks!
Looks good, yeah.
Mar 30 2025
@avivey does this look good to you?
Why would a cancel URI be needed? Do you know a Cancel URI for an app with something that prompts for MFA (ie. exposing Passphrases, empowering users, signing comments with MFA, managing your VCS password and SSH keys)
That's what I tested (as the Files application can be uninstalled). Which exact application(s) did you test?
I'm surprised that you did not run into the same problem as I did described in my last comment...maybe it's related to not being an admin?
Tested this locally; technically it looks correct to me.
Any application were canUninstall is not set to false (thus not a required application).
As which type of user?
A user with the Can Configure Application capability (by default admins).
Fix typos reported by @aklapper.
Clear Test Plans with URIs are welcome - the less others need to think "how/where to do that" the easier gets testing.
@Cigaryno: Thanks! Could you elaborate why the change in .arcconfig is needed?
Should be fine after these two changes :)
Thank you both for the conversation here and further thanks @Cigaryno for the patch! :)
Mar 29 2025
Make lint happy
Mention closed-source apps in addition to open-source apps per @aklapper
Per @aklapper, it's best to show both closed-source and open-source TOTP apps.
I'd personally not remove common proprietary software options (as it makes life of users potentially harder if they already have such an app installed) but list FOSS options first.
I'd prefer not to remove common proprietary software options but list FOSS options first.
I will submit a patch shortly.
What is there to "further review"? It's two lines...
Can this be further reviewed?