@avivey that's an excellent observation.

In D25203#6703, @valerio.bozzolan wrote:

I'm not bold enough to approve as O1 since they would probably like to keep the "yum" stuff or at least mention both for legacy reasons

In D25120#6777, @valerio.bozzolan wrote:

(Ufff I'm always super-hiped when I see "Accepted" in the email notification... but then I realize it's not from Blessed Committers 🥺 What a difficult world for us #PuppyCommitters.)

Makes sense to me, as it mirrors the way the persistent chat tab/box itself is hidden in durable-column.css:

Seems reasonable and simple enough. Can we get a Blessed Committer to accept this?

In T15121#8063, @avivey wrote:

Any contribution to Phorge is implicitly covered by Apache 2.0, which allows re-licensing by anyone.
The CLA is only making this explicit.

In T15121#3880, @valerio.bozzolan wrote:

I honestly do not want to allow my contributions to be re-licensed, since this usually means that the repository owner wants to re-license that work under a proprietary license when needed. I don't accept that. Normal volunteers do not accept that. This is probably not what we want.

Maybe, the personal Settings → Email Preferences could have a mention to Conpherence, to say "list your Rooms and change your Settings" with a link to /conpherence/search/ or something