Organizations Using Phorge
Are you using Phorge? Add yourself here!
| Who | Description | Users | ActiveUsers | Local Patches | Contributes | LastCheck |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER Inform. | another private IT company in Italy | 30 | 15 | few | yes | 2023-06 |
| GitPull.it | a made in Italy community | 80 | 3 | no | yes | 2023-06 |
| WMF | Wikimedia friends | 1000+ | 100+ | many (T15081) | yes | 2023-06 |
Legend
- Users: users that are not-disabled, not-banned, not-spam, with at least one action.
- Active Users: average indication following the general definition of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_users
- Local Patches: indication of local-only changes (something not in Phorge)
- Contributes: whenever somebody there proposes patches to Phorge to improve that organization
Copyright
This list is provided in Creative Commons Zero license - public domain.
- Last Author
- Cigaryno
- Last Edited
- Jun 28 2023, 21:08
Event Timeline
Should we add FreeBSD to this list? It uses Phorge now (as of June 2023) and has many users.
(Much of their documentation still refers to it as "Phabricator", despite this.)
I also can't exactly get a read on what they're using there, whether it's Phabricator or Phorge.
Perhaps someone who happens to be on the FreeBSD forums should ask about it, or perhaps a FreeBSD dev could add it to this page.
The instance is at https://reviews.freebsd.org/
The line proposed:
| Company | Description | Users | Active Users | Local Patches | Contributes | Last Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FreeBSD | The FreeBSD Project | 1000+ | 100+ | unknown | unknown | 2024-02 |
I've successfully updated our Phabricator instance to Phorge today. After paying very careful attention to everything it went smoothly without any issues. Glad that this project has not died. Phabricator grew on me as well.
Wow! Thanks FreeBSD folks! Yes, feel free to add and thanks.