=== Meeting Notes 1. Regular meetings. Start with every other week. - @avivey this time is a bit early - @Matthew unable to make this current time until school courses end - Proposed new day: Tuesdays - Proposed new time; ~2 hours after current time (7pm UTC) - This would be manageable for most people - Even if some attendance isn't capable we should be taking good notes which can be reviewed. 2. High priority task: Rebranding - There are several options to move forward here. Either try to work with upstream (preferred) and get general branding changes upstream first. Otherwise we do a quick find/replace in Phorge. - Find/Replace option -- this would effectively officially bifurcate Phorge from Phabricator, since it's such a large change. - Working with upstream would benefit from coordinating and learning from Evan. - **General strategy** (working with upstream): 1. For each application, review all user-facing text and rephrase it to be general purpose text, such as referring to "Phabricator" as "the installation" or "the platform". See https://secure.phabricator.com/D21712. 2. For any user-facing documentation which requires referencing "Phabricator", there is a new remarkup interpreter which can use `{{{ strings.platform.name }}}` which will resolve to the defined name 3. Anything which refers to `phabricator` as a path on disk, which is not user-facing, can remain for now and be addressed in a different change. This helps to limit to scope of necessary changes for the branding effort. - **General process** 1. Create a table with the applications, allowing people to grab and work on application 2. Submit changes for review in Phorge 3. After accepted, changes are submitted upstream to Phabricator (by @avivey, @speck, or others with an upstream account) 4. //Do not// land the changes in Phorge -- Phorge will eventually pull in all changes from upstream, assuming Evan provides review and suggests changes. 3. Release process - This might not need to be fully defined until we complete the rebrand. - Should we re-fork after the upstream rebranding? This doesn't seem to be necessary. Only benefit is a cleaner history but we'll have to branch at some point. - We do need a Diviner book for migrating from Phabricator to Phorge. Many corporate users will want/need this. 4. Spammers - Wikipedia has a change which just hides the profile content for disabled accounts. This prevents these pages from showing up in web searches etc. This change is non-destructive (no database changes). In the future a change to mark an account as spam would be very nice but is a larger change (e.g. hide the user account's name from all other pages it would show up). - Would requiring email validation help? Based on the existing accounts it wouldn't really help. - Adding recapcha to create an account might help, but again the current spam accounts appear to all be human-created. === Action Items - [x] @avivey Set up a table of the Phorge applications, organizing the effort to being rebranding - {T15077} - [ ] @speck Update the strategy for how we're going to approach the rebrand so others can contribute - [x] @avivey Communicate our strategy with the upstream - https://secure.phabricator.com/T13658#256501 - [x] @speck Update meeting notes, organize into Phriction pages - [[ /w/planning_meetings/ ]] - [x] @Matthew Set up new recurring meeting - {E2}, not recurring due to current limitations with #calendar, see {T15076}