Work related to Phorge, the organization that develops Phorge (the software).
Details
Tue, May 21
@avivey that's an excellent observation.
That "don't sign a CLA" article should be titled "don't sign away your copyrights", to be more accurate and less click-bait-y. A CLA may ask you to sign away copyrights (which I feel makes the project non-open-source) ; It doesn't have to.
Mon, May 20
I'm pretty fine with DCO (which I already do every commit via the git commit -s command) — but I'd rather not sign a CLA. (I’m pretty undecided if I will sign phorge's CLA, but phorge is not commercial entity seeking to mongodb/terraform/elasticsearch-ize the software (read: make a profit from open source, then turn it into All Rights Reserved) so I might do so… after all these incidents I'm rather wary of it.)
Wed, May 15
Fri, May 10
Apr 29 2024
Apr 28 2024
Yeah, thad makes sense, I guess.
Suddenly, yesterday I was also talking in one of the kanban communities and I had to tell them that Phorge is a fork of the Phabricator, and not some kind of independent thing without a background. People don't quite understand this.
Apr 27 2024
Apr 26 2024
Apr 25 2024
Apr 23 2024
Good question.
Apr 20 2024
Apr 18 2024
Yeah, that might help (like specifically in the case of the Clone dialog) even though it wouldn't help with dialogs containing writable inputs. (E.g. on the repository page, click Flag For Later instead and press Shift+Tab and Escape.) A better fix would lie at https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge/browse/master/webroot/rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Workflow.js$413 where either the getSpecialKey would need improvement itself to return true for these non-modifying keys, or it would need to be amended with a custom check in that regard. However, I don't know where that function comes from.
Probably something here should be expanded to check if the form contains at least a visible input without read-only
Apr 16 2024
:p
I was responding to the previous comment which...
Our company uses the Phorge, and we use Keycloak as IAM. Keycloak is a very popular OAuth2/SAML provider now.
Apr 15 2024
Apr 13 2024
GitHub/Facebook is already supported as a Login/Registration providers.
Apr 9 2024
Apr 8 2024
Apr 5 2024
Did that Phactory: Hosting Projects Here
Apr 2 2024
I can reproduce this, on an hosted Subversion repository.
Yes will be great to see a SAML or Oauth support for external authorities like:
- Keycloak
- Entra ID
- Github
- WeChat / WeCom
Mar 28 2024
Mar 25 2024
Premising that we may want to rollback 328aee033fbd, probably this line is broken: