Change Details

Marking as security due to potential abuse by spammers. We really should hide the profiles and profile pictures of disabled users. I think we should do this non-destructively, hide them by checking the disabled flag then hiding the UI elements. That would allow for a profile that's restored to have the same information as before - AKA if a user is accidentally disabled by a rogue admin account then that user can be re-enabled without loosing anything. This will be easy for profile descriptions (as they're in one place). This will be hard for profile pictures (as they're all over).

Marking as security due to potential abuse by spammers. We really should hide the profiles and profile pictures of disabled users. I think we should do this non-destructively, hide them by checking the disabled flag then hiding the UI elements. That would allow for a profile that's restored to have the same information as before - AKA if a user is accidentally disabled by a rogue admin account then that user can be re-enabled without losing anything. This will be easy for profile descriptions (as they're in one place). This will be hard for profile pictures (as they're all over). [X] Blur disabled users' profile pictures. [X] Hide user descriptions. [ ] Hide user badges.

Marking as security due to potential abuse by spammers. We really should hide the profiles and profile pictures of disabled users. I think we should do this non-destructively, hide them by checking the disabled flag then hiding the UI elements. That would allow for a profile that's restored to have the same information as before - AKA if a user is accidentally disabled by a rogue admin account then that user can be re-enabled without loosing anything. This will be easy for profile descriptions (as they're in one place). This will be hard for profile pictures (as they're all over). [X] Blur disabled users' profile pictures. [X] Hide user descriptions. [ ] Hide user badges.