Page MenuHomePhorge

Add docs for color code formatting
Needs ReviewPublic

Authored by revi on Tue, Apr 30, 08:42.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, May 15, 13:17
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, May 12, 05:28
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, May 11, 01:45
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, May 10, 09:37
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, May 10, 08:44
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, May 7, 18:50
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, May 7, 09:06
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, May 6, 18:54

Details

Reviewers
None
Group Reviewers
O1: Blessed Committers
Summary

Because there was no docs written at D25540, I opted to guess from the codes (and commit messages) to write it. (I admit I didn't test this RGB code thingy personally)

Test Plan

Read the Docs (tm) and verify it renders.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phorge
Branch
master
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 1207
Build 1207: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

revi requested review of this revision.Tue, Apr 30, 08:42
NOTE: I will not have desktop access for next few days, so if you can just arc land it when you approve it, it'd be appreciated.

Just a question. Does it work for you? Since locally, {#FA8072} still does not work for me.

Also, I'm sincerely inclined in proposing this alternative syntax that would be super-stable:

D25540#16460

Haven't tested yet, I was just trying to document the patch behavior.

Or maybe what GitHub does might be of interest? (But also just my opinion)